Good for the goose, good for the gander

By Don Frost

Copyright 2023

            Black activist Al Sharpton Jr. today called for a boycott of all white-owned businesses in protest of a poll that he said indicated there is wide-spread racism among America’s white population.

            The poll, conducted by the Washington Post, posed the question to a sampling of white Americans: “Do you think it is okay to be black?”

            Results showed that only 53% agreed it was okay to be black, but 26% did not think it was okay and 21% were uncertain.

            “So nearly half of all white Americans 47% – think there’s something wrong with being black,” Sharpton said. “This points to systemic racism in America today.”

            He went on to say, “I don’t want to have anything to do with them. They are a hate group.  . . . the best advice I would give to black people is to get the hell away from white people. Just get the fuck away, because there is no fixing this.”

            Newspapers were quick to condemn Sharpton’s racist rant.

            “We are not a home to those who espouse racism,” one editor said. “We certainly do not want to provide them with financial support.”

            Another editor added, “We cannot and will not provide a forum for those who engage in such rhetoric.”

            Adding to the chorus of condemnation, another editor said, “We denounce Sharpton’s comments as racist, hateful, and discriminatory, and we no longer will provide a platform for his activities.”

            Pretty outrageous. But none of the above ever happened; it’s pure fiction. Except most of Sharpton’s quotes. Those words were actually spoken by Scott Adams. The editors’ quotes also are real, but they were directed at Adams.

            What did happen is a hypothetical imagining of the same poll showing those same numbers, but with the races reversed. In that actual poll 47% of black Americans figured it was absolutely not okay to be white or there was at least something so wrong with being white that the respondents couldn’t say if it was okay to be white or not, and that the question required more thought.

            Adams, creator of the “Dilbert” comic strip, was pretty much turned into a nonperson when he objected to what the actual poll bared. There is, however, a significant difference between his case and the fictional Sharpton case: Adams was pilloried and his career scuttled as “liberal” world rallied to condemn him and his views.

            In defending the decision to destroy Adams, “liberals” point out that the poll to which he was responding was a figure of speech (they prefer the word “trope”). In other words, the poll was not to be taken literally. Further, they claim the poll posed “a loaded question” tailored by white supremists to get a predictable result.

            However, even while poo-pooing the poll, “liberals” do not challenge its results. They do not claim the poll never took place or if it did, the results were invalid. This, in effect, is an admission that the poll was conducted and the results were accurately reported.

            If the Washington Post or any other publication were ever stupid enough to conduct such a poll among white Americans, there would be protests, marches, and perhaps riots and looting. And no one – least of all the Al Sharptons of the country – would have had their careers ruined by the cancel culture as Adams was.

            Adams agrees. In a subsequent interview he was asked if a black American would have been canceled for saying the same thing he did, but with the races reversed. He laughed. “Not a chance in the world,” he said. “I just wanted as much free speech as a black American.”

The 1st Amendment needs a rewrite

By Don Frost

            From the Constitution of the United States:

            “Amendment I (1791): Congress shall make no law . . . prohibiting . . . or abridging the freedom of speech . . .”

            Fine words. But notice that it applies only to Congress. That loophole means anyone can punish anyone they please if they do not like something that person said. Put another way, with the support of a mob, you can prohibit and/or abridge anyone’s freedom of speech.

            The federal government can’t do that, only a mob can. The icing on the mob’s cake: The American whose freedom of speech has been so stifled has no legal recourse. For him, that clause in the 1st Amendment is dead.

            Think this is a ridiculous Right-wing conspiracy theory? Just a conservative fantasy; another rant? Ask Scott Adams if he’d agree.

            The creator of the “Dilbert” comic strip said something a lot of folks didn’t like. So they turned out with their torches and pitchforks and scuttled his career. The echo of his forbidden words hadn’t even died away before those who employed him began racing to distance themselves from him, to fire him, and to struggle like champions to see who could most eloquently condemn his opinion. It was as though there was a national contest to see who could come up with the greatest outrage over his words, his views.

            What he said is irrelevant. The important point is his opinion didn’t jibe with the opinions of the mob, so he had to be eliminated, turned into a non-person. Anyone who disagrees and thinks his opinions, his words, were so outrageous, so dangerous, that the mob’s actions were justified should immediately petition Congress to amend the 1st Amendment.

            America can no longer afford a government that is hamstrung in persecuting those with unpopular opinions. Congress must be empowered to make laws “prohibiting or abridging the freedom of speech.” What people say and think is far too important a matter to be left to mob rule. Procedures should be put in place that would allow government to punish those who harbor bad thoughts, then releases them willy-nilly on an unsuspecting, unprepared public.

Please forgive the sarcasm. It is born of an inner fury at the sanctimonious posturing of “liberals”; those who ganged up to destroy Adams’ career lest they be called racists for failing to denounce him.

            It has been a hallmark of American culture and our legal system for nearly 250 years that each American is granted the freedom to speak his mind and no harm will come to him. Technically the 1st Amendment applies only to Congress, but down through the centuries every American has taken “the freedom of speech” into our hearts, applying it to all people in all circumstances; in all venues. But no more.

            The French writer Voltaire usually is erroneously cited as the author of these words: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

            A generation or two ago Americans could proudly agree with that statement. “Yes, that’s what America is all about,” we used to say. “That’s why the freedom of speech is enshrined in the first amendment to our constitution.”

            We can’t say that any more. Now the famous adage needs to be altered in the reality that America has become. Now it should read, “I disapprove of what you say, and if you repeat it, I will cause you to suffer; I will crush you.”

            Big Brother would approve. And the Left cheers.